For questions, articles, and discussions regarding water blaster modifications.
-
marauder
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:29 pm
- Location: Charleston
- WWN League Team: Havoc
-
Contact:
Post
by marauder » Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:37 am
Theoretical question here, how would you convert a lever (250, 275, 300) to a trigger?
-
isoaker
- Posts: 7115
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 1:51 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
-
Contact:
Post
by isoaker » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:53 pm
I have a feeling one may need to replace the entire valve assembly and rig up a trigger and trigger-wire system. The trigger valves on the 250, 275 and 300 appear to require a good amount of torque to rotate and are in the wrong direction for a trigger (lever points upwards as opposed to downwards). While one could potentially try to rig up some sort of pulley system, a valve replacement may be more successful overall.

-
HBWW
- Posts: 4110
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:12 pm
- Location: MI
- WWN League Team: Havoc
Post
by HBWW » Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:18 pm
Triggers... the bane of high performance water blaster design. The first part to fail in stock blasters, and last part to get finished/fine-tuned in homemades. In any case, for large ball valves you really need a trigger supported by more than one finger. (i.e. Hydro Cannon, or a few homemades that use a length of PVC as long as the width of a hand for pulling on as the trigger.
-
marauder
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:29 pm
- Location: Charleston
- WWN League Team: Havoc
-
Contact:
Post
by marauder » Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:18 am
The reason I like triggers is that they are so much more ergonomical than levers. You can pump and shoot at the same time, you can pull a trigger faster than you can pull a lever... but if it's a difficult thing to do I'd just take performance as is cuz all 3 of those guns are good. It seems like we see an SS 300 on ebay only once a year though. Shame.
-
HBWW
- Posts: 4110
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:12 pm
- Location: MI
- WWN League Team: Havoc
Post
by HBWW » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:43 pm
The tricky part here is to have a trigger whose PITA-to-design factor is less than the benefit of the significantly improved ergonomics and tactical improvements. Perhaps we need to re-think the way we do things in order to achieve both though. (Achieve a low PITA-to-design factor as well as an ergonomical improvement close to or equal to that of a traditional trigger. The big idea here is pumping while shooting along with a spring loaded control.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests