Post
by HBWW » Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:39 am
I haven't gotten to actually shoot, but was able to handle, the Python 2 and Colossus 2. All I have to say so far is that BBT has seriously improved ergonomics and balance in their designs over the past recent years. I do hope they maintain this; the grips, if your hand fits, are very comfortable. The balance seems to be very well done too since some of the water weight goes into the shoulders, although I haven't tried filling up either blaster. Still, the blasters have a "bullpup" feel to them with weight shifted a bit to the shoulders, which IMO was done the right way. I also love that the trigger guard only covers the trigger now instead of the whole hand.
Looks like the Python 2 got a performance upgrade, while the Colossus 2's performance reduced. Perhaps this won't be the case in the future.
Also, I apparently mistook the angle meter as a pressure gauge. I never checked out this feature, so I may pick up a Python 2 to try it out. It may be more useful than it seems to be.
As for the Colossus 2, perhaps performance is being inhibited by the intake tube design. The original had the problem where the intake does not stay on the bottom, though that was discussed earlier.
We've had the WW Piranha, Tiger Shark, and Vindicator with, IMO, really bad ergonomics. The improvements made in 2012 and 2013's lines have been significant, and I hope WW blasters maintain this. A good performance boost is still very welcome though, although the competitor's products are already so bad that BBT may have decided that performance wasn't worth investing in.
I don't buy blasters for comfort and features, but the Python 2 is looking like a better option the more I look at it. And I thought I was finished buying from the Season Opener.