Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:47 pm
Talk about Shield Blasters!
WaterWar.net
Forums
https://www.waterwar.net/forum/
SHIELD BLASTERS - I have all 3.../ so just talk about em
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:49 pm
Eh, my favourite one is the Shield Blaster 3000. Big shield, strap, has 3 nozzles it shoots from at once. It Rocks!
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:50 pm
Well, Shield Blasters are one of my favourite guns.
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:53 pm
Aw man, nobody, (I REALLY wanted isoaker_com to come...) is coming.
Shield Blaster 2000 is pretty good, but not good enough to be able to play in a 3 hour war. The opponent will be able to defeat it after 30 minutes or so...
Edited By monarchqb12 on 1118606639
Shield Blaster 2000 is pretty good, but not good enough to be able to play in a 3 hour war. The opponent will be able to defeat it after 30 minutes or so...
Edited By monarchqb12 on 1118606639
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:54 pm
Shield Blaster 1000 should only be used to raise the number in your collection. It has a small shield, 1 nozzle, bad stream, and no strap.
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:55 pm
Doea anybody want to come???
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:56 pm
WELL
I GUESS NOT!
I GUESS NOT!
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 2:57 pm
Man...[/B] Nobody ius coming 
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:00 pm
My Group
I am leader of JAM Power Drenchers & Super Soakers!!
I am leader of JAM Power Drenchers & Super Soakers!!
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:02 pm
VS Who's the least happy?
Who's the most happy?
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:06 pm
Nine, count 'em, nine posts all in a row, all by you. Bad etiquette, dude. Very bad. Please don't do it again. I'm not going to delete this topic or take disciplinary action though (I think Isoaker will).
Isoaker moved your other ShieldBlaster topic to another forum, there were some people talking about them there...that's were you should talk about them. Just don't post more than twice in a row, ok?
Adrian
Isoaker moved your other ShieldBlaster topic to another forum, there were some people talking about them there...that's were you should talk about them. Just don't post more than twice in a row, ok?
Adrian
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:22 pm
This is a message board, not a chat room...
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:48 pm
Ok, as emperor_james noted, this is a message board, not a chat room. While this thread could have had merit, its beginning is lousy and thus will be deleted shortly. This is also not the first time he's been warned about multiple posts and random replied.
As such I've restricted monarchqb12's access to some extent and can only hope his board habits will improve (if he shows signs of improvement, he'll get full membership access back).
For those curious what restrictions are imposed, basically 'restricted' members can only start topics in the 'Soaker Basics' forum. Replying is allowed in 'The Briefing Room', 'The Cache', and 'Soaker Network', but not topic starting. The remainder remain Read-Only. As well, PM priviledges are revoked while restricted.
@ monarchqb12: read Bad Posting Habits thread for some insight into why your posting style is unwelcome here. We try to keep the community flowing happily and can only hope you'll understand why we run things the way we do here.
As such I've restricted monarchqb12's access to some extent and can only hope his board habits will improve (if he shows signs of improvement, he'll get full membership access back).
For those curious what restrictions are imposed, basically 'restricted' members can only start topics in the 'Soaker Basics' forum. Replying is allowed in 'The Briefing Room', 'The Cache', and 'Soaker Network', but not topic starting. The remainder remain Read-Only. As well, PM priviledges are revoked while restricted.
@ monarchqb12: read Bad Posting Habits thread for some insight into why your posting style is unwelcome here. We try to keep the community flowing happily and can only hope you'll understand why we run things the way we do here.
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:40 am
I have just tested out my Shield Blasters, and SB 3000 seems to be able to block extremely well. The only bad thing is, you can't shoot and block at the same time, you can only do one at a time. Shield Blaster 2000 is pretty good, however, it does have a very limited water supply (especially if you use the nozzle setting where it shoots three streams of water) and it's shield isn't entirely big. The good side though, is that it's possible to block and shoot at the same time.
And, if it's not chatting, sorry about that. I'm really sorry.
And, if it's not chatting, sorry about that. I'm really sorry.
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 7:43 am
Next, I have not really TESTED out my Shield Blaster 1000, but as I have practiced with it, it really is horrible. Don't buy it isoaker.com ( unless it's just to bring up the number in your armoury, because it is pretty cheap).
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:08 am
Have you still not learnt? Do NOT keep double posting! You should not post another reply until someone has replied to your last post.
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:11 am
Sorry. Anyways, Shield Blasters are good for just a normal water fight, but not for a huge one ( say, like a war).
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:30 pm
Ya, I've tried them and they are not the greatest (not even close actually) I bet he just works for the people who make "shel' blasta!" (chineese guy accent) 
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 7:06 am
i personally do not like shield blasters.
1: unless you have lightning-quick reflexes, you'll still get hit a little bit because you can't block it the instant before it hits you.
2: you're still vulnerable to snipers and stealth attacks.
3: if a bunch of people are shooting you at once, you'll still get drenched. so the shield isn't very good in conclusion.
also, the shield makes the blaster very large, odd-shaped, and generally unwieldly. the stream it shoots is rather weak, and it has a very odd pumping mechanism.
1: unless you have lightning-quick reflexes, you'll still get hit a little bit because you can't block it the instant before it hits you.
2: you're still vulnerable to snipers and stealth attacks.
3: if a bunch of people are shooting you at once, you'll still get drenched. so the shield isn't very good in conclusion.
also, the shield makes the blaster very large, odd-shaped, and generally unwieldly. the stream it shoots is rather weak, and it has a very odd pumping mechanism.
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:49 pm
also if, as you state they aren't even good enough for a war, why do you like them, seriously answer me, why ARE you SO obsssed that you constantly double post and 9x post?!
PS: Isoaker_com, are you going to let him keep his post count for all those useless posts?
PS: Isoaker_com, are you going to let him keep his post count for all those useless posts?